Theosophy was
founded in New York City in the 1870s by Russian emigrée Helena
Petrovna Blavatsky and it soon spread to other parts of America,
to London, and to India. Informed by ancient Hindu writings, it
promotes a vision of reality that may seem religious but which
for its adherents is simply an description of the way things
are—one gained through extrasensory perception and hence not
testable in the way that scientific theories are. Gifford
observes that "The 'scientific' exactitude of some of the
phrases ('Communication was effected', 'It was ascertained',
etc.) lampoons the style of reports published by the Society for
Psychical Research in London. The society was founded in 1882
for the purpose of making 'an organized and systematic attempt
to investigate that large group of debatable phenomena
designated by such terms as mesmeric, psychical, and
spiritualistic'." Further systematized starting in the 1890s by
English spiritualists Annie Besant, Charles Webster Leadbeater,
and Alfred Percy Sinnett, among others, Blavatsky's teachings
settled into a more or less fixed set of beliefs, but they never
became articles of religious faith.
One belief in particular is central to the
Cyclops
parody. The "
etheric double," according to the doctrine,
is the first in a series of progressively finer replicas of the
human body known collectively as a person's aura or astral body,
which is not an emanation from the physical body so much as an
essential form that predates, generates, and sustains it. At the
moment of death, this "double" stands outside the physical body
and perceives realities normally unavailable to physical sight,
but not in the permanent way that eternal truths are revealed to
Christian souls. The double hovers near the physical corpse and,
as Gifford puts it, "it gradually disintegrates; subsequently a
new etheric body will be created for the rebirth of the soul,
since one earth-life is not considered sufficient for the full
evolution of the soul. In context, Dignam's etheric double is
'particularly lifelike' because it is only just beginning to
disintegrate."
The sense organs of the etheric body are the Hindu
chakras
(Sanskrit for wheel) which impart vitality to the physical body
and also effect communication between the earthly and astral
planes. Joyce's parody describes a spiritualist séance in which
the living make contact with the departed Dignam via these
energy centers: "when prayer by
tantras had been
directed to the proper quarter a faint but increasing luminosity
of
ruby light became gradually visible, the apparition
of the etheric double being particularly lifelike owing to the
discharge of
jivic rays from the crown of the head
and face. Communication was effected through the
pituitary
body and also by means of the
orangefiery and scarlet
rays emanating from the
sacral region and solar plexus."
These sentences faithfully reproduce a number of Theosophical
teachings about the chakras.
Hindu
tantras are ritual formulas for effecting magical
change, both "white" and "black" according to Blavatsky. Here,
the chanting of tantras causes Dignam's luminous aura to appear,
its "jivic rays" reflecting Hindu teachings about the
jiva,
a universal life-principle manifested on the seven planes of
existence—Blavatsky calls it "a ray, a breath of the ABSOLUTE."
Dignam's rays emanate from "the crown of the head" (the seventh,
highest chakra) and from the "face" (the sixth). The sixth
chakra, which is located between the eyebrows and associated
with the pituitary and pineal glands, is the "third eye" that
enables spiritual vision. Leadbeater writes in
The Chakras
(1927) that for some people "the pituitary body" constitutes
"practically the only direct link between the physical and the
higher planes." The "sacral region" and "solar plexus" are the
second and third chakras, located respectively several inches
below and above the navel. Joyce thus mentions four of the seven
chakras. His luminous colors reflect Theosophists' assignment of
different colors and symbolic meanings to the various chakras.
In addition to sketching the contours of the non-physical body,
the parody introduces Theosophical eschatology when Paddy is
"Questioned by his earthname as to his whereabouts in the
heavenworld."
Blavatsky called the state between death and reincarnation the
Devachan—"heaven-world"
or "place of the gods" (
Deva, a word referenced later in
the parody, means shining one, god, heavenly being). Paddy
replies that "he was now on the path of
prālāyā or
return"—not a Christian return to the Creator but reincarnation
in a new life. The Hindu term
pralaya (destruction,
dissolution, rest) refers to a period of nonexistence between
manifestations—typically the end of the universe between cosmic
cycles, but here the time in which the individual has died and
not yet returned to physical existence.
During this hiatus between existential manifestations the spirit
hangs in a liminal state, aspiring to higher spiritual
conditions but still tethered to earthly attachments and
tormented by unsatisfied desires. Paddy says that he is
undergoing "trial at the hands of certain bloodthirsty entities
on the lower astral levels." I do not know of a source for this
idea, but he may be referring to the demonic spirits found in
some Indian subcontinent religions, to the restless ghosts of
people who died violently, or to vicious forces within the
individual psyche. He reports, however, "that those who had
passed over had
summit possibilities of atmic development
opened up to them."
Atma or
Atman is the divine
principle within or behind each individual self that is
imperishable and unaffected by worldly experience. Some highly
evolved spirits achieve liberation from the endless cycle of
births and deaths, and realize the
Atman within
themselves. This is the "summit" of human aspiration.
Maya (appearance, illusion, magic) is the Sanskrit word
for the illusory nature of all cosmic manifestations, all
phenomena. In
The Key to Theosophy Blavatsky writes that
"everything is
illusion (
Maya) outside of eternal
truth, which has neither form, colour, nor limitation. He who
has placed himself beyond the veil of maya—and such are the
highest Adepts and Initiates—can have no Devachan." People who
have reached the summit of atmic development, in other words,
transcend the liminal state, but "The
Devachanee lives
its intermediate cycle between two incarnations." Paddy is not
one of the Adepts, but he takes advantage of his present devanic
detachment to warn people living in the grip of illusion that
they should change their lives. "Asked if he had any message for
the living," he "exhorted all who were still at the wrong side
of
Māyā to acknowledge the true path for it was reported
in
devanic circles that Mars and Jupiter were out for
mischief on the eastern angle where the ram has power."
Joyce cannot be accused of exaggerating or falsifying these
exotic doctrines, but he presents them in the irreverent spirit
of all the parodies. In one small act of disrespect, he
undermines the precise eastern truths by casually adding
familiar English expressions to the mix. Dignam's questioners
ask him about his "first sensations in
the great divide
beyond" and he says that "
previously he had seen as in a
glass darkly"—two western commonplaces in thinking about
death, the latter from Paul's
Corinthians. Far more
subversively, he then mocks the notion of a liminal "devanic"
state between earthly lives by showing the astral Dignam to be
fundamentally no different from Paddy in the flesh.
"Interrogated as to whether life there resembled our experience
in the flesh," Paddy reports that "more favoured beings now in
the spirit"—more highly evolved souls, presumably, hovering on
higher astral levels—tell him that "
their abodes were
equipped with every modern home comfort such as tālāfānā,
ālāvātār, hātākāldā, wātāklāsāt." Life there, it seems,
does resemble our experience in the flesh, and it may even (in
the manner of crude Christian fantasies of heaven) improve it,
with telephones and elevators for everyone. Rewarding spiritual
purity with consumer conveniences surely violates the notion of
seeing through the illusory goods of
Maya. The mockery
goes ballistic with the endless a's, not to mention the Sanskrit
diacritical marks that Joyce added to them on page proofs of the
first edition. They invite readers to adopt the reverent tone of
a wise Indian sage while contemplating the virtues of hot and
cold running water.
Earthly values persist, more subtly, in the news that "the
highest adepts were
steeped in waves of volupcy of the very
purest nature." Volupty means pleasure, according to the
OED,
and the adjective "voluptuous" strongly connotes sexual
pleasure. Being steeped in waves of it makes the pleasure sound
distinctly orgasmic, as if Adepts are rewarded with something
like the seventy virgins of Islam. Such a suggestion hardly
suits the ascetic ethos of Theosophy, which expects sexual
chastity, vegetarianism, and other kinds of corporeal discipline
from its practitioners. Gifford tries to sidestep the
implication by noting that the volupcy is
pure, but
nothing about "waves of volupcy" sounds very Theosophical. One
might suppose that Joyce wanted to liken the experience of
enlightenment to Christian notions of visionary ecstasy. But it
seems more likely that he was sarcastically evoking a bordello.
As for Paddy himself, he seems not merely swayed by memories of
his past life but still in it. Absurdly, he retains hunger and
the ability to satisfy it: "Having requested a quart of
buttermilk this was brought and evidently afforded relief."
Asked "whether there were any special desires on the part of the
defunct," he responds, "
Mind C. K. doesn't pile
it on." Theosophists of Joyce's era
addressed each other with initials (in
Scylla and Charybdis
Blavatsky is "our very illustrious sister H.P.B."), and with
this mode of address Paddy asks
Corny Kelleher not to pile the dirt
too heavily on his coffin. Certain aspects of earthly
consciousness, it seems, are slow to disintegrate. This
impression is hilariously amplified when Dignam tells his son
where to find his missing boot and where to get it resoled,
remarking that "this had greatly perturbed his peace of mind in
the other region."
At least one more detail in this parody bears glossing. The
people channeling Dignam's spirit hear, "
We greet you,
friends of earth, who are still in the body." The
editors of
JJON have found works indicating that both
phrases, "friends of earth" and "still in the body," were
current in Theosophical discourse of the 1880s and 90s.